This is essentially my response to an unmade Feature Request to try all known bots before failing to get a fax.
#FAXBOT ELF CODE#
I am inclined towards the latter but it will make some code in some scripts unnecessary. Modify faxbot() so that it checks other bots in case of failure and uses the presence/absence of the photocopied monster to define success/failure.Īnd there are always things I have not thought about. This essentially moves the iterate over bots until success or end of list from mafia to the script.Ĭreate int robust_faxbot() that returns 1 if the requested monster was faxed, 0 if there is already a photocopied monster (possibly unknown) in inventory and -1 if it failed. (Tangentially, I did not see the expected prompt from a photocopied monster present so I don't know whether I don't quite understand the code or what so there is some work to be done).ĪFAIK there is no easy way for a script writer to detect that a bot did not return the desired fax and try a different bot.Īdd ash functions so that a scripter knows which bots are available and whether a monster is available from a specific bot. An attempt (temp code change) was made to check the next bot when the first one failed, but if chat was not running the result was getting a fax from one bot, not knowing the status, and then getting a fax from the next bot. The faxbot() command iterates over all bots and returns the result from the first one. The faxbot online status is based upon /whois and is not changed by the non-success of fax attempts. There is dead code that once aborted the command if chat was not running but that code is disabled, presumably in 2012. Since the faxbot command checks for a photocopied monster in inventory and offers the chance to dump the fax or abort, several scripts ignore the return from faxbot() and instead detect success or failure from the presence of the photocopied monster. Sometimes false means the attempt was made and definitely failed but sometimes it just means the attempt was made and the status is unknown. It returns true if a monster was successfully faxed but false does not mean the attempt was unsuccessful. My specific concern was the ash command faxbot() but some of these comments apply to fax support in general.Īt present faxbot() will only request a monster from the first faxbot that has it. Updated 2 taps (homebrew/cask and homebrew/core).In response to I started looking at the code. => Homebrew is run entirely by unpaid volunteers. If those don’t help, or if this issue is reporting something you think isn’t right, you can always ask the humans behind semantic-release.
#FAXBOT ELF HOW TO#
If you are not sure how to resolve this, here is some links that can help you: You can also manually restart the failed CI job that runs semantic-release. Once all the errors are resolved, semantic-release will release your package the next time you push a commit to the master branch. With each error reported below you will find explanation and guidance to help you to resolve it. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪.Įrrors are usually caused by a misconfiguration or an authentication problem. Each one of them has to be resolved in order to automatically publish your package. You can find below the list of errors reported by semantic-release.
I recommend you give this issue a high priority, so other packages depending on you could benefit from your bug fixes and new features. 🚨 The automated release from the master branch failed.
0 kommentar(er)
